▶ Your Answer : The lecturer forms the argument that we didn’t have any closer understanding to the origin of domesticated dogs. In stark contrast, the reading passage claims that the domestication of dogs has three logical reasons. To begin with, the lecturer asserts that ancient hunters could not have evolved from wolves. This is because ancient hunter could not train wolves because wolves became more aggressive as they get older. Moreover, they had different hunting skills including ancient hunters set trap quickly because otherwise wolves chased down their prey. This casts doubt on the reading passage’s claim that domesticated dogs evolved from wolves.
Furthermore, the lecturer maintains that the dogs were domesticated much earlier than 16000 years ago. According to the lecture footprints found in French caves proved that dogs were domesticated about 26000 years ago. (better: archaeologists, a cave found in French contained the foot prints of dog and boys walking side to side.)This refutes the reading passage, which states that the DNA mutation like present day dogs occurred 16000 years ago.
Finally, the lecturer contends that the origin of domesticated dogs did not occurred Just in China. To elaborate the details, domestication of dogs’ fossils were found in multiple spaces such as Europe, North America, and Middle East. To be specific, DNA analysis showed domesticated dogs have 4 distinct ancestor in different locations. This detract from the reading passage’s argument that dogs were originally domesticated in China. This is because the highest genetic diversity is in their places of origin, It appears dogs first emerged in China.
예상 점수: 27-30 총평: 큰 문제없이 글을 잘 써주신것 같아요. 실수만 유의하시면 될 것 같습니다. 수고 많으셨습니다. |