▶ Your Answer : The reading passage contends that the Etruscan migrated from Turkey with three theories. On the other hand, the lecturer makes counterargument with three points.
First, the author asserts that DNA evidence reveals that the Etruscans have Turkish roots. The experts found genetic link between Etruscans and ancient Turks. However, the professor points out that DNA evidence was so old it could have been damaged. Furthermore, Given that a lot of people have contacted the remains in Etruscan gravesites, the bones could have been contaminated.
Second, the writer describes Etruscan language as indicator that Etruscans originated from Turks. linguists found some similarities between Etruscan and Turkish. Moreover, Etruscan is significantly different from languages spoken in northern Italy. In contrast, the speaker refutes the argument, saying that different language might have similarities alphabet. On top of that, Etruscan might be the only one surviving member of a language family.
According to the reading, a final link between the Turk and the Etruscans is found in shared funerary practices, cremation. no other groups living in northern Italy at the time are known to have practiced cremation. On the other hand, the professor asserts that the cremation has was practiced in northern Italy before Etruscan came ,which means that Etruscan did not bring it from Turkey.
밑에는 리스닝 내용만 따로 다시한번 써본건데 문법적 오류 해주시면 정말 감사하겠습니다..
Lecturer asserts that DNA evidence can not be an appropriate evidence. This is because DNA evidence is thousands years old, which means that it could have been damaged. Moreover, since a lot of people have had contact with bones in the site, it would might have contaminated DNA evidence. However, the speaker contends that some similarities between Etruscan and Turkish can not be a conclusive link between them because different languages could have similarities. The reason for Etruscan is very different from other European languages might be that Etruscan was the only surviving member of language family. In contrast, the lecturer refutes the reading’s argument, pointing out that cremation has been practiced in Northern Italy before Etruscan started to live there, which means that Etruscan were just successors of a tradition of some region in Northern Italy, not brought it from Turkey.
예상 점수: 17-21 총평: 시제 오류가 정말 많습니다. 시제를 확실하게 해서 글을 써주시는게 좋을 것 같아요. 현재의 글은 시제 문제가 많고, 철자 오류도 많아서 기초적인 부분에서 감점이 많이 됬습니다. 내용이나 비교는 크게 문제가 없이 잘해주셨습니다. 수고 많으셨습니다. |