In this set of materials, the lecturer argues that there is a the hope that more women are entering scientific fields while the writer worrys about lacking of womein in science.
First of all, according to the lecturer, people in science are attracting more women into scientific fields. To be specific, teachers in schools encourage girls to have interests in studying more on scientific areas by praising their abilities are needed for science. Those efforts are enriching the opportunites for girls' participation in science fields. This point contradicts the writing passage's view point that gender prejudice underestimates women's traits as not suitable for studying science.
Secondly, the lecturer claims that women does not feel financial burden studying science thanks to various scholarships. Those funds enables them to focus on their studying without caring for money.
(without any concern about tuition fees)
Also, they can continue on academical research even after the Ph.D processes while marrying someone and rasing their kids. This refutes the writers' argument that demanding courseworks and low salaries discourage women who have also responsibilities for marriage and nursery from studying science for a long time.
Lastly, the lecturer mentions that some organizations only for women open the windows for them to go in to the man-predorminated scientific fields. The organizations not only make some provisions which promote equally treat towards women banning any kinds of sexism, but also create fun activities for female. With these desirable supporters, women are breaking a glass celling contrary to writer's thought.
gud essay^^
|