▶ Your Answer : In this reading passage, there is ample support for the author's claim that the unique structure of hammerhead shark head has specific evolutionary merits. However, the professor in the lecture gives several reasons as a rebuttal to the author's point.
First, the professor contends that the unique head structure does not strengthen a vision of hammerhead shark. Although widely space eyes can help hammerhead shark have a deep perception. But, it will be a drawback directly. To be specific, sharks need to vision to identify prays and avoid an obstacle. However, the eyes are situated at wide head are not conducive to detect what is located at their forefront. This casts doubt on the reading passage's claim that unique head structure of the hammer sharks can help them have good vision.
Next, the professor insists that there is no sciencific evidence about hammerhead shark has a better sense of smell. Most sharks just have proper smell for hunting. So, they can not compared to other sharks about having a good sense of smell. This counters the reading passage's assertion that the shape of hammer help the sharks have a better sense of smell.
Finally, the professor argues that the shape of hammerhead does not help them move fast. They do not use their head when they turn to other side. In fact, they have more flexible backbone comparing to other shark. So, that is why they can move faster then other. This refutes the reading passage's suggestion that the unique head shape allows the animal to turn quickly.
Fair: 17~23 점수: 23 리딩에 대한 정보가 부족한 통합형 에세이입니다. 통합형 에세이에서 가장 중요하게 차지하는 것 중에 하나가 한 주제에 대하여서 서로 다른 정보를 가진 리딩과 리스닝이 어떻게 서로 반박하고 비교하는 지를 보여주는 것 입니다. 지금 이 에세이 같은 경우에서는 리스닝에 대한 정보는 충분하지만 리딩에 대한 문장은 한 문장으로만 서술 되어 잇습니다. 한 문장으로 리딩에 대한 정보를 끝내는 것 보다는 리스닝을 좀 더 반박할 수 있는 부분들을 더 서술해주시길 바랍니다. 수고많으셧습니다. |