▶ Your Answer : The reading passage states about suncralose being banned due to health problems while the listening passage refutes this point by providing several opposing examples. To begin with, the author maintains that people who consume suncralose have a bigger danger of worsening diabetes. To explain more, cells become resistant by the increase of insulin. Even more, diet soda develops diabetes. On the contrary, the lecture contradicts this idea by mentioning that diabetes have an unlikely possibility. Insulin increase cause different substances appear. Even more, obesity is the cause to people who drink diet soda. Furthermore, the writer asserts that suncralose produces harmful substance when cooling. Especially, in a high temperature, chloropro is produced and toxic commpounds trigger cancer. Conversely, the speaker belies this claim by saying that there is actually no harmful substance when being cooked. The test did not involve real-life ingredient. Specifically, materials were heated in higer temper than normal. Moreover, the passage contends that the mortal drawback of suncralose is about intensing allergic reactions. People have some diseases such as dizzy, headache, and seizures becuae their body cannot process synthetic substance. In contrast, the lecturer rebuts this point by stating that there is no evidence proving of allergic reactions. Searchers are thought to might hear and just imagine symptoms simply. To be more specific, the examination didi nto have severe reactions.
Good: 24~30 점수: 26 지적 할 부분이 없는 통합형 에세이입니다. 통합형 에세이에서 가장 중요하게 보는 것 중에 하나는 한 주제에 대하여서 서로 다른 정보를 가진 리딩과 리스닝이 어떠한 부분에서 서로의 의견을 반박하는 지를 보는 것 입니다. 지금 이 에세이 같은 경우에는 이러한 부분에 있어서는 완벽하게 잘 서술된 거 같습니다. 리딩이나 리스닝 둘 다 불필요한 정보 없이 꼭 필요한 것만 서술해서 넣은 거 같습니다. 잘 서술하였습니다. 수고많으셧습니다. |