▶ Your Answer :
The reading contends that there is a growing consensus that the Etruscans migrated from Turkey, giving the three reasons. On the other hand, the lecturer brings up several points that contradict this argument.
First of all, the lecturer points that it is unreliable that DNA evidence shows that the Etruscans have Turkish roots. This is attributed to the fact that the DNA samples from bones before the thousands of years ago can be contaminated. This refutes the reading passage's view that the scientist found that a specific type of DNA from remains and concluded that the genetic markers are related to the ancient Turks.
Moreover, in the lecture, the point is made that the language used by the Etruscans does not indicate that their ancestor is from Turkey. This is because the different languages may have the similar alphabet and the languages used by ancient Turks and Etruscans are not the same family. This casts doubt on the author's idea that Etruscans' alphabet is originally Turkish.
The final point made by the lecturer is that they do not have a similar form of funerary practices. It is obvious that the Etruscans were just a successor of the practice in the local region. This is different from the passage's point that because there are no other groups living in northern Italy that shares this tradition, the Etruscans shared the characteristic funerary practices with Turkey.
첨삭을 받아 본 적이 없어,, 실력 가늠이 안되네요ㅠㅠ 채점도 같이해주시면 감사하겠습니다:) |