▶ Your Answer :In the reading passage, there is ample support for the
author’s claim that it is now understood that dogs are when, how, and where
became domesticated. However, professor in the lecture gives several reasons as
a rebuttal to the author’s point.
First,
the professor contends that dogs are not form wolves. To be specific, hunting
way of wolves is not consist consistent with method which exist in ancient time. Also,
people can’t cannot manage or trained train wolves because when they get older, being
aggressive. this casts doubt on the reading passage’s claim that dogs come from
wolves that get trained by human as hunting peers.
Next,
the professor argues that domestication of dog occurred since 26,000 years ago.
There is pair of food print which is dog and children in cave. According to the
analysis of foot print, they were originated from 26,000 years ago. This
refutes the reading passage’s suggestion that Scientist could conclude that
dogs were domesticated nearby 16,000 years ago by comparing difference in DNA
between modern dogs.
Finally,
the professor insists that it is not truth that the origin of dog came from in
China. To be specific, The oldest dog fossil were founded in variety of
countries such as Europe and North America. Also, the recent research proves
that their ancestors are four.
This counters the reading passage’s claim that dogs
were domesticated in china and then disperse to other areas around the world. Good: 24~30 점수: 26 통합형 에세이에서 가장 적합한 에세이였습니다. 약간의 문법적 오류들이 있었지만 전체적인 에세이 플로우를 방해하지는 않았습니다. 통합형 에세이에서 가장 중요한 부분을 차지하는 것은 리딩과 리스닝을 얼마나 적절하게 잘 비교하였냐 인데 지금 이 에세이는 이러한 부분에 있어서는 아주 잘 서술하였습니다. 빠지는 정보없이 리딩과 리스닝을 적절하게 잘 비교한거 같습니다. 수고많으셧습니다. |