▶ Topic : According to the reading passage, rootworm is one of the most devastating pests to corn. There are three methods to remove the rootworm. However, in the lecture, the professor gives several reasons as a rebuttal to the reading passage. First, the professor insists that concerning the fact that the strong pesticide does not work well, applying pesticide can not? (지문을 보지 못해서 확답은 드리지 못하지만, 기존의 표현상으로는 충돌이 있으므로 이게 맞을 겁니다.) kill the rootworm . However some small and resistant rootworm can survive and they can reproduce in a much faster rate. In addition it is bad for the environment. This casts The cast doubt on the reading passage’s point that a common way to get rid of the rootworm is the use of strong pesticides. and environmental issue will be get to improve. (일단 문장을 and but so 로 시작하지 말아주시고, 여기는 살충제를 통해 환경 문제가 나아진다는 내용인가요?) Second, the professor argues that assertion regarding planting earlier does not work either. corn Corn is susceptible to cold and frost weather; thus they will die be died. after After they die, rootworm can eat the corn. This refutes The refute the reading passage’s assertion that we can prevent rootworm from eating corn by planting corn earlier than normal. Lastly. the, the professor contends that claim about alternate planting is not reliable. Rootworm rootworm can dormant for 2 years; thus rootworm can survive 2 years without eating. Once corn grows, rootworm ruin the corn farm again. The counters the reading passage’s suggestion that farmers could plant corn one year and they soy in the next. This alternating alternation of crop planting will starve rootworms to death because they cannot eat soy.
총평: 일단 오타가 많은 편이므로 이를 줄이는데에 신경써주셔야 합니다. 그리고 아이엘츠 시험과 달리 토플은 대소문자에 관해서 관대한 편이긴 하지만, 그래도 문장의 시작은 꼭 대문자로 해주세요. 어차피 외국 유학 때문에 시험을 보실텐데, 이러한 기본적인 습관을 기르는 게 나중에도 도움이 됩니다. 크게 지키기 어려운 사항도 아니고요. 또한 템플릿으로 답안을 작성하시는지 확실하지는 않지만 만약 그럴 경우 약간의 잘못된 표현들이 있으므로 다시 한번 확인해보세요! 수고하셨습니다 :) |