These days, Korean parents tend to move their house into the cities for the sake of their kids' better education system. With the firm belief that what they are doing to their kids will later greatly help in their kids' future, then the parents send their kids to the academies in cities and therefore force them to shoulder the insurmountable amount of assignments. I was one of the kids who were raised in this way, and with the personal experiences I took through living this kind of life, I firmly believe that for children growing up in the countryside is far better than in a big city.
First of all, in most cases kids of countryside are not confined in the great amount of daily assignmnts from academies, after-school academic courses, and so on. Therefore, they have more time and chances to study more than students of the cities. For example, countryside kids know much better than city kids about the name and the feature of certain flowers, animals, or trees, albeit the countryside kids have rarely learned about those things. At the same time, as countryside kids participate in farmwork and small-sized sports festival in school, they get to know how to build good social relationship with others.
On top of that, by living in the countryside kids can grow up more healthily than when they grow up in the big, smoky cities. As a matter of fact, it is obvious that kids of countryside will be healthier than those of cities, for they inhale oxygen with less ashes, drink water with less chemical wastes, and eat vegetables with less pesticides. Recent scientific research supports this obvious idea, reporting that the kids of the countryside have a far less percentage of having serious diseases such as cancer, leukemia, and polio than those of the big cities. In addition, kids of countryside are physically healthier than those of cities because the country kids play sports and farmwork while the city kids sit in front of their desk and check up the answers for their homework. According to a recent article about education, these kids with better physical health would surpass the ones with worse health in academic activities too, for the physical health has an unknown link with mental health.
In a nutshell, I think living in countryside will help kids to grow up better rather than living in the big cities. The kids of countrysides are freer than those of the big cities in terms of academic activities, and also they will be both physically and mentally healthier than the city ones. Therefore, all things considered I think countryside will be the better place for kids to grow up than the big cities.
여기다가는 처음 써봤는데.. 망친거 같네요 ㅠ.
문장의 흐름도 맞지 않고..
암튼 이렇게 쓰면 Independent Section에서 몇점정도 나오는지 알려주세요~ 감사합니다.
*추가 질문: 제가 저번에 네이버 토플후기 블로그에서 30분내에 600단어 이상 쓰면 Context가 안좋아도 최소 26점 받는다고 본 적이 있거든요~ 30분내에 600단어 이상 쓰는 것은 미국인들도 잘 못쓰는 거라고. 그래서 Intro랑 Conclusion 쌈빡하게 쓰고 나머지 600단어 이상으로 채우면 최소 26이라는데.. 맞는 소리일까요? ㅠㅠ.. 30분내에 600단어 쓸 수는 있는데... 400단어 15분 정도면 다 쓰거든요? 400단어를 빨리 써서 남은 15분동안 계속 체크하는게 나을지, 아니면 600단어를 쓰는게 나을지 좀 가르쳐 주세요~ |