In the lecture, the speaker cast doubts on the advantages of bilateral aid, which was demostrated in the reading. He maintains that only donor countries are able to take advantage of giving aid to developing countries.
First, the lecturer points out that developed nations obtain their economic goals by giving aid to the recipients. Such aid is not done by kindness or compassion from one country to another. Rather, the donor countries will try to gain the benefits by developing markets in the recipient countries. Weapons, cars, and home appliances will be sold in the recipient's market.
Second, the professor argues that the leader and the privileged people in emerging countries will have most of the aid money. Aid fortunes will not evenly distributed to ordniary people, and they will not be actually used to develop the nation. Those who have power will take all the advantges.
Last, the speaker states that bilateral aid will not be helpful to spread the donor's political ideology. It could seem that the recipient adopts a benefical ideology. However, the developed countires would only have the certain form of government superficially to meet the donor's requirement. The lecturer gives an example of the countries adopting either democracy or communism during the cold war.
아......... 절망
왜케 안써지죠.ㅜㅜ
미치겠어요.
시간 초과했어요.
오늘 공부가 잘 안되네요 ㅜㅜ
구조나
문법적 오류등..
시험보기전에 한번만 은총을 내려주셔서
첨삭을 보고 갈 수 있도록 도와주세요!
부탁드립니다.!! (__)