▶ Your Answer :
The lecturer argues that some proposal to stop WNS can not be implemented. This contradicts the reading passage's claim that there are proven effective ways to stop the disease. First, the lecturer points out that increasing acidity in bat caves are not a good idea. The WNS is known to be tolerant for acid condition. Moreover, in order to make highly acid condition in the cave in almost impossible. This cast doubt on the reading passage's claim that making the cave into highly acid condition will discourage the fungus from expanding. Next, the lecturer maintains that involving antifungal treatments are not the answer. Antifungal will be more harm than good since it will kill beneficial fungus as well. In addition, it is impossible to implement in such delicate environment. This refutes the reading passage's claim that antifungal treatment will decontaminate the area where fungus is growing. Finally, the lecturer explains that giving artificial habitats for the bat is impractical. The bat spices will have huge numbers and it is hard to capture all the wild bats and keep them in the artificial cave. Also, it will be safe when they are in the artificial cave, but once they are released they will be vulnerable agin to WNS. This strongly challenges the reading passage's claim that artificial cave will keep them safe from WNS.
Fair: 17~23 점수: 23 전체적으로 리딩에 대한 정보가 부족한 통합형 에세이입니다. 통합형 에세이에서 가장 중요한 부분을 차지하는 것 중에 하나는 한 주제에 대하여서 서로 다른 정보를 가지고 잇는 리딩과 리슨닝이 어떻게 서로를 비교하고 있는 가 입니다. 지금 이 에세이 같은 경우는 리스닝에 대한 정보는 부족함 없이 서술되었지만. 리딩의 정보는 한 문장으로만 끝났습니다. 따라서 좀 더 리스닝을 반박 할 수 있는 리딩에 대한 정보를 서술하는 것이 좋을 거 같습니다. 수고많으셨습니다. |