▶ Your Answer :
The lecturer asserts that the reading’s claims are not persuasive. This casts doubt on the reading’s point that there are plausible methods of using coal without causing environmental issues.
First, the lecturer argues that converting coal into a gas is not a good solution. The process requires to burn fossil fuel to generate heat, which cancels out the advantage of transforming the coal into syngas. This challenges the reading’s explanation that since this method removes almost impurities from the coal, emissions are not generated by gasification.
Second, the speaker contends that using static electricity is no better. The process results in releasing carbon dioxide. This can be a more damaging problem compared to the dust from coal. This opposes the reading’s claim that it is a beneficial method because electricity can extract the pollutants made by coal from the air.
Finally, the lecturer claims that using fabric filters has some drawbacks. The filter usually has a short life. As a result, it has to be replaced, which is not economically effective. Also, installing fans also spends too much energy. This rebuffs the reading’s argument that using fabric bags is a good strategy. Harmful particles from coal emissions get filtered out by these bags and removed.
점수: 22 리딩에 대한 정보가 많이 부족한 통합형 에세이입니다. 통합형 에세이에서 가장 중요한 부분을 차지하는 것은 한 주제에 대하여서 서로 다른 정보를 가지고 있는 리딩과 리스닝이 어떻게 비교하고 반박을 하는 것인지를 보는 것 입니다. 지금 이 에세이 같은 경우는 리딩에 대한 부분이 각 단락에서 한 문장으로만 서술하였는데 한 문장으로 끝내는 것 보다는 리스닝을 좀 더 반박할 수 있는 부분들을 더 서술하시길 바랍니다. 수고많으셨습니다. |