The disagreement between the reading and the lecture is in progress over the issue of factors that allows England to achieve Industrial Revolution first. While the author emphasizes optimal condition for Industrial Revolution and increase of population, the lecturer denies its views with the claim that there are other things that make those possible.
To begin with, the two are on the opposite ends over the situation of Britain at that time. The writer maintains that Industrial Revolution in England was realized by dramatic improvement of technology and abundant natural resources. However, the speaker has different view that monetary assistance and colony market enabled them. Specifically, thanks to trades and colonies, Britain was capable of supporting technology innovations with monetary assistance and providing raw materials and market for factories. This contradicts with the reading's assertion that profusion of natural resources in England and advancement of technology change England agricultural economy to industrial economy.
In addition, the author and the professor are contradicting one another regarding the increase of population. The speaker asserts that laws made by England at that time forced a significant numer of people in rural areas to cities. On the other hand, the author refutes this assertion with the claim that growth of population was achieved through improving technology on farming and moving of countless skill peasants to towns with no force. Based on this, the author denies the claim of speaker who asserts that legislation rendered most of peasants, who comprised country's most of population, to move to urban areas and they naturally worked in the factories
[출처] 인티그레이티드 라이팅 |작성자 SOS
[챔프스터디] 동영상 강의 종합포털(TOEIC/TOEFL/TEPS/IELTS/취업/비즈니스실무/자격증/중국어/일본어) -www.champstudy.com-