A company should invest in supporting the arts rather than in protecting the environment.
1 they are in charge of curing the environment
2 they are getting a good reputation
There is no reasonable doubt that investing in supporting the arts makes it possible for companies to take part in improving the art's industry. Nonetheless, by spending money on protecting the environment, companies truly obtains great advantages. Most importantly, they are in charge of healing the environment.(I feel like this sentence has some reasonable doubt..) Moreover, they are able to acquire a good reputation which is the foundation of generating tangible outcome.
Throughout history, we have undoubtedly been received a lot from the nature. By taking advantage of fossil fuels, our lives have been dramatically improved. Also, with using natural resources, we are able to develop highly advanced technology. Under such circumstances, needless to say, our generous mother: the Nature always offers us a tremendous amount of gifts for us without any receiving return. To destroy the nature(you mean that companies are willing to destroy the nature? If not, this part is awkward in a sense.), companies have played such a big role as some of them get rid of harmful chemicals such as lead into rivers. Also, even big corporations have utilized(how about "exploited"?) a lot of natural resources in the name of development. This is the time they should do something to cure the environment which is allegedly in danger. For example, according to the well-known magazine “Economist,” it recently revealed that the main problem the environment has encountered is the Global Warming. And if big corporations invested in reducing factories’ leftovers, or using alternative energy sources, the level of temperature will reduce greatly. Since the environment deserves to be given better treatment, companies should spend their funding on protecting the environment instead of supporting the arts. (your ideas and vocabs. seem great!)
With spending companies funding on curing the nature, companies are now able to achieve a well-reputation not only from people, but also from the government. Recently, many countries’ governments have decided to support environmental friendly companies which loudly speak. What is more, due to this reasonable investment, a tremendous number of customers can be allured. For instance, when going to supermarket and looking at products, I saw many products advertising not only their information, but also what they do for the environment. In this particular situation, I, in general, purchase products whose companies invest the environment (here at this point, look at before and after... I have no idea about how the first part and the second part are related.)given that by buying them(?), I could feel that I also participate in healing the environment. In this respect, companies are able to generate profits more productively by earning a good reputation.
Albeit companies and the arts’ industry benefit from spending money on supporting the arts, it does not necessarily mean that it is more important than protecting the environment. The environment should be treated as a priority because receiving a well-reputation(how about "good reputation"") can be practically guaranteed as well as companies are charged in in charge of saving the environment.