선생님들에게 학생들의 성과에 따라 월급 주는 것에 동의하는가
As society is getting competitive and controlled by the logic of capitalism in these days, education theory has undergone a revolution by these social trends. Many people argue that teacher should get their salaries according to their students' achievements that make both teachers and students more competitive than before. However, controlling teachers by different salaries is not the best idea for the better education system because students are easily changed with various environmental reasons and the standards of students' achievements are hard to be determined.
Students are susceptible to be changed by surrounding situation such as not only by classroom atmosphere but also by their own family environment. Teachers are not the one who can change the classroom atmosphere which sometimes are more affected by classmates and family situations are differ from each others. There is a study published in 2000 which indicated that personal achievements are more affected by family environment and colleagues rather than teachers' influences. Therefore differenciating salaries to teachers have not sufficient grounds.
On top of that, it is arguable how to judge teachers' roles by achievements of students. Every student has different abilities and talents. Some students got a gift for drawing, some might be good at a specific sport and some are more interest in solving math problems. Achievements of each student can be translated in various ways along with each student’s possibilities. For example, when I was in high school, there were a class with many academically great students and another class with students more focusing on sports. However, the president of the school had always praised to the academic achievements.
In a whole, different payments for teachers according to their students' accomplishment are absurd. There are many elements to evaluate students' abilities and their achievements are not solely coming from teachers' abilities.
--
아웃라인을 헷갈리게 했더니 쓰면서 시간 엄청 부족했다는 ㅠㅠㅠㅠ