In the reading passage, flexible working arrangement is benefitial to emploters(오타),employees, and faminly(오타) bonding. The lecterer(오타) brings up several points to contradict this statement.
First of all, E(->e)mployers wil(오타) lose their money because it is hard for them to have team-meeting at certain time. Since all workers work at different time, having team-meeting is almost impossible. Also, E(->e)mployers have to pay more maintanance fee because ofiice(오타) have to be open for only few workers. This point casts doubt on the reading passase's assertion that flexible working arrangement is good for employers because their companies' productivity will increase.
Also, I(->i)t is does not positivly(오타) effect affect employees. Employees will not be able to have any sense of team working. Since all employees work at different time, they have a difficulty in making friends in company. This rebuff(오타? 이 단어 자체로는 못 써요. 다른 단어 쓰시려다 이거 쓰신 것 같은데..) the reading passage's claim that employees will feel free.
In addition, it is have has negative effect on family relationship. They will have less time with their family because they leave and come home at different time. It will distrupt(오타) their relationship. Without flexible time policy, they come home at simmilar(오타) time. And(and는 문두에 못 와요. 그냥 앞의 문장과 연결해도 문제 없을 것 같아요) they can have in-depth time with each other. This refutes the reading passage which states that family will have more time to spend together, and(and 앞에 콤마 와야 함) it will strengthen family bonding.
|