In the lecture, the speaker cast doubts on the advantages of bilateral aid, which was demostrated in the reading. He maintains that only donor countries are able to take advantage of giving aid to developing countries.
First, the lecturer points out that developed nations obtain their economic goals by giving aid to the recipients. Such aid is not done by kindness or compassion from one country to another. Rather, the donor countries will try to gain the benefits by(from_ )developing markets in the recipient countries. Weapons, cars, and home appliances will be sold in the recipient's market.
Second, the professor argues that the leader and the privileged people in emerging countries will have most of the aid money. Aid fortunes will not evenly distributed to ordniary people, and they will not be actually used to develop the nation. Those who have power will take all the advantages.
Last, the speaker states that bilateral aid will not be helpful to spread the donor's political ideology. It could seem that the recipient adopts a benefical ideology. However, the developed countires would only have the certain form of government superficially to meet the donor's requirement. The lecturer gives an example of the countries adopting either democracy or communism during the cold war.
아무래도 이런유형은 리스닝과 리딩과 함께한 롸이팅이죠? 그럼 기본적으로 정확한 내용이 우선이겠구요,
그리구 이제 그래머나 structure 일텐데, 이런 structure 에 실수하시지 마시고 한다면
좋은 점수 받을수 있을 거예요.
되도록 (시간이 허락한다면) 쓸수있는 내용, 뤼딩이나 리스닝에서 듣고 읽은 내용 다 잘 이어서 쓰시구요,
그리고 중간에 쓸때, 예를들어, According to the lecture or in the reading passage, 이런식으로 시작해서 뤼딩과 리스닝에서 받은 정보를 쓰시는 것도 좋을것 같구요, reading passage 랑 그 리스닝이 의견이 반대라면
It constrasts the reading passage that~ 뭐 이런 비슷한 말들로 하시고 비슷하게 support 해주는거라면,
It supports the reading passage that~/이런식으로.....
그리고 되도록이면, those, they 이런것들 문장 중간에 쓸때, 헷갈리지않게 specify 해주시고요 (예를들어 그 they 가 people 이라던가, 사물이라던가..)
- 채점자가 되도록이면 쉽게 자연스럽게 어려움겪지않고 매끄럽게 읽을수 있게 배려해주는거죠'
그럼 자연스레 점수도 더 주지않을까..싶네요
시험좋은 결과 있길 바랄께요 ^^