■ Direction You have 20 minutes to plan and write your response. Your response will be judged on the basis of The quality of writing and on how well your response presents the points in the lecture and the relationship to the reading passage. Typically, an effective response will be 150 to 225 words. ■ Question Summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard, explaining how they cast doubt on the points made in the reading
|
|
|
▶ Topic :
The lecturer argues that not everyone
agrees with the advantages of wave-energy facilities and even contends that they
are illusion. This directly contradicts the reading passage’s claim that wave-energy
has distinctive strengths that will make it increasingly common in the near
future.
First, the
lecturer maintains that there is another factor to consider when it comes to
the reliability of the wave-energy. The convertors can have technical problems.
To be specific, in the harsh marine environment, they experience a lot of
breakdowns (단복수), so it is easy for them to malfunction. This casts doubt on the
reading passage’s claim that the wave-power is a constant and predictable
resource of energy.
Second, the
lecturer claims that it is easy to dismiss the assumption that wave-power
facilities are eco-friendly. The convertors contain harmful chemicals, which enable
their turbines and other parts of them to (enable smt to V 입니다) move freely. Thus, they might have
negative influence on the marine organisms. This refutes the reading passage’s
claim that wave-energy does not harm environment, because it does not use
fossil fuels and contaminate the ocean.
Lastly, the
lecturer asserts that wave farms do harm the landscape. The reason is that the
convertors are highly visible. They are painted with bright colors in order to
be easily found by the shipping vessels, which makes tourists could detect them
as well. This rebuts the reading passage’s claim that wave-energy generators
are not noticeable, and thus, they do not distract the tourists from the
natural scenery.
|
|
|
|
1. 보시면 introduction이랑 body paragraph랑 분량의 거의 비슷합니다.
1:3 정도 되도록 바디의 분량을 많이 늘려주세요.
2. reading and listening의 비율이 너무 listening쪽으로만 치우쳐져 있습니다.
비율은 5:5, 적어도 6:4 정도는 되어야 합니다.
이는 리딩에 대한 디테일 부족으로 이어지며, 분량 부족, 추가 설명 실패 등으로 이어질 수 있으니
리딩에서도 evidence를 많이 찾아서 써주시면 좋을 것 같습니다.
3. 문법에서는 단수/복수에 대해 특히 주의해주세요.
수고하셨습니다. *^^*