▶ Your Answer :In the reading passage, there is ample support for the author's claim that Etruscans orignated from Turkey. However, the professor in the lecture gives several reasons as a rebuttel to the author's point. First, the professor contends that the research using ancient DNA is hard to believe. Ancient DNA has lots of possibilities that could be demaged. Also, given a number of people that could touched bones in the study site, DNA might be contaminated. This casts doubt on the reading passage's claim that from the findings on the Etruscans gravesites Etruscans have Turkish origin. Next, the professor insists that there is no connection between Etruscan language and Turkish language. Other two different languages sometimes have some similar alphabet. The link between Etruscan language and Turkish language can't prove the commention of this two languages. In addition, there is no same language family with Etruscan, but it could be only language from that language family. This counters the reading passage's assertion that Etruscan language shows that Etuscans are migrated from Turkey. Finally, the professor argues that there is no reason to connect Turkish funery practices to Etruscans. Italy had funery practices since thousands years ago, and it seems that funery practices of Etuscans are from Italy. Etruscans just successed local practices. This refutes the reading passage's suggestion that a relation between Etruscan and Turks funery practices can prove Etruscans are from Turkey.
Good: 24~30 점수; 24 리딩에 대한 정보가 너무 부족한 에세이입니다. 통합형 에세이에서는 서로 다른 정보를 가진 리딩과 리스닝이 어떻게 서로 반박하고 있는지를 보는 것 입니다. 이러한 부분을 알기 위해서는 적절하고 충분한 리딩과 리스닝의 정보가 필요한데. 지금 같은 경우는 리딩에 대한 정보를 한 문장만 서술하였습니다. 한 문장으로만 리딩을 서술하는 것 이아니라 리스닝을 좀 더 반박할 수 있는 부분들을 더 서술하는 것이 좋을 거 같습니다. 수고많으 셧습니다. |