In
the reading passage, there is ample support for author’s claim that the use of automated telephone system has
several advantages when conducting surveys. However, the professor in the
lecture gives several reasons as a rebuttal to
the author’s point.
First,
the professor contends that using automated telephone system takes +time longer
to be complete surveys. This is because the rate of response is lower compared
to survey conducted by human. People tend to response well in human conducting
survey since they do not want to be rude. This casts doubt on the reading’s
claim that the target number of people can be reached more quickly using this
method.
Second,
the professor insists that it is not true that automated surveys may be able to
get more accurate answers. Since the machine cannot confirm respondents’
identity. For example, although young boy gets to phone and provides wrong information
like age or gender, the machine cannot detect and take proper action. This
counters the reading’s assertion that authomated
surveys increase the chance of receiving accurate answers from respondonts.
Last,
the professor argues that it does not make sense that the probability of errors
is lower when using this method. In the case of machine, if respondents
misunderstand questions or response wrong answers, it cannot count these
mistakes. While, human can detect respondents’ hesitation in their voices and take
correct actions to fix errors. This refutes the reading passage’s suggestion
that mistakes never happen when authomated telephone system is used.
good: 24~30
점수: 24
리딩에 대한 정보가 먾이 부족한 통합형 에세이입니다. 통합형 에세이에서 기본적으로 많이 보는 것 중에 하나는 에세이가 얼마나 잘 서로 다른 정보를 가진 리딩과 리스닝을 잘 비교했나 입니다. 지금 이 에세이는 이러한 부분에 있어서 잘 못 한 거 같습니다. 한 문장으로 리딩에대한 정보를 서술하는 것이 아니라 리스닝을 좀 더 반박할 수 있는 부분들이 필요해 보입니다. 이러한 부분을 잘 숙지하면서 통합형 에세이를 서술하시길 바랍니다. 수고많으셨습니다.