▶ Your Answer :
Whether developing human's circumstance or preserving environment is a very controversial issue these day. Some people claim that human needs for farmland, housing, and industry are more important, but others think saving land for endangered animals is more potential. Both sides may have their own reasons to support their opinions. I, personally, think that keeping land for endangered animals are more important rather than human needs for farmland, housing, and industry. To begin with, if people destroyed environment and changed for human needs, it would seem to be beneficial at present. However, in the future people may have big troubles. Let me bring up our country as an example. In 1970s, people keeping out of starving was a big issue in my country. We did not think about our environment and we extended our farmland and industrial area. Now, our country is one of the most developed country in Asia, but we have some environmental problems. Some domestic animals like tigers, bobcats, wolves are endangered or disappeared. For it, our ecosystem is lost its balance. Our government work to restore some of them or buy them from other countries. But, it is still difficult to restore and to maintain balance of our ecosystem. Also, people should have responsibility for our environment. I think that people make most of the endangered animals. They make farmland, housing and industry on the home of animals. Therefore, animals who lost their home from people have to move to another places. Moving is a horrible path for animals. They are dead, hurt, and lose their family and friends. We should not hurt animals because of our greed. We should preserve animals boundary. To sum up, making farmland, housing and industry give us bad effects in the future, and we should not make animals to endanger. In this regard, I strongly disagree that human needs for farmland, housing, and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals.
|