▶ Your Answer :
In the set of materials, the writer and the
speaker cover the issue of sucralose, an artificial sweetener. The professor
argues that the reading material’s claim is not convincing. This contradicts
the reading’s point that sucralose is harmful for people’s health.
First of all, the speaker points out that
sucralose is not the effect of increasing in the production of insulin. There
are other causes for producing insulin, she knows that in some test, it can be
seemed laving similar results. However, in general, there are many things which
show similar results but not the same cause. This casts doubt on the reading
material’s point that sucralose trigger an increase in the production of
insulin.
Moreover, the second argument the professor
asserts is that there is no evidence for showing that sucralose in high
temperature is the cause to cancer. To be specific, scientist did lab test, and
finally they found that sucralose which reach a high temperature don’t contain toxic
substance and isn’t the reason for cancer. This counters the reading’s claim
that harmful substance can be produced from sucralose, when it used for
cooking. This is because sucralose can combine with other chemical when the temperature
goes up.
Finally, the lecturer maintain that intense
allergic reactions are not the outcome of sucralose. There is not any evidence
to prove that idea. All scientist who did the tests say that test determine
that sucralose is safe for dizzy and headache. Also, it can be the reactions
from patient’s mind. This refutes that one of the drawback of using sucralose
is that it can trigger severe allergic reactions.
|