▶ Your Answer : The reading passage contends that carbon sequestration is an effective approach to reduce CO2, carbon dioxide. One the other hand, the lecture brings up several points that contradict this argument. The lecture asserts that the number of phytoplankton would not be permanently increased. When organisms multiply, nitrogen is are emitted, which reduces the number of organisms. Also, according to the recent research, only a small number of phytoplankton in the ocean are sequestered even though iron is dumped into the sea, which is the phytoplankton's staple. Because the population of phytoplankton would not greatly increase, co2 in the atmosphere would not greatly decrease through the buring of co2 and phytoplankton together. This counters the reading passage's assertion that~?. lecture 내용 정리가 너무 깁니다. 더 간단히 정리해주시고, reading의 어떤 주장에 대한 반박인지도 내용 추가해주세요. The lecturer argues that artificial wetland is not effective to sequester co2. It is true that the rate of decomposition in the wet land is low, so the amount of released co2 is relatively small. However, tThe lecture suggests one recent study which shows that the capacity of storing chemicals in the wet land is not that big. Also, it takes too long to develop the wet land fully. Wating until the wet land is developed is too late for the environment. This refutes the author's claim that artificial wetland is a proper way to sequester co2. The final point made by the lecture is that storing co2 in abandoned coal mines has some problems. It is proper to say that co2 are attached to coals. However, nNot all the co2 adheres to coals and some can leak are leaked into the atmosphere. Furthermore, when coals are burned, they release methane which generates co2. This debunk the reading passage's claim that storing co2 in discarded coal mines is an appropriate way.
Comment : 전반적으로 두 지문의 내용은 잘 파악해주신 것 같은데, 설명 표현이 어색하거나 빠진 내용, 불필요하게 긴 설명 등이 감점요인이 될 것으로 보입니다. 파악하신 내용 중 핵심이 되는 것들만 추려서 더 간결하게 내용을 정리할 수 있도록 다듬어주세요. 수고 많으셨습니다~!
Integrated Writing Rubrics Score 3/5 A response at this level contains some important information from the lecture and conveys some relevant connection to the reading, but it is marked by one or more of the following : - Although the overall response is definitely oriented to the task, it conveys only vague, global, unclear, or somewhat imprecise connection of the points made in the lecture to points made in the reading. - The response may omit one major key point made in the lecture. - Some key points made in the lecture or the reading, or connections between the two, may be incomplete, inaccurate, or imprecise. - Errors of usage and/or grammar may be more frequent or may result in noticeably vague expressions or obscured meanings in conveying ideas and connections. |