▶ Your Answer :
In the given materials, there are some arguments about a trend of reading literature. The lecture questions the three points of the reading's assertion that young people read less literature like novels, plays, and poems these days than they used to. >space The first point the lecture makes made is that not only literature but also non-literature is helpful for us to be creative, to stimulate our intelligence, and to make imaginations. There are a lot of high quality books about science, history, or politics. This contradicts the reading's view that we miss out on important benefits like creation, imagination, and intelligence because we read less literature. >space Another claim the lecture puts an emphasis on is that there are plenty of culture like music, movies, or music videos. Culture is changed and entertainment is another form of culture. This casts doubt on the reading's point that the level of culture lowers because people spend more time doing entertainment instead of reading literature. 문화 수준이 낮아지는 것에 대한 반박이므로 단순히 '문화에는 종류가 많다'라고만 정리하기보다 '낮아진 게 아니라 종류가 달라진 것뿐이다'하는 식의 표현으로 반박 '주장'임이 더 명확해지면 좋을 것 같습니다. >space Finally, according to the lecture, some literature is too difficult to understand. Therefore, people read less literature these days. This refutes the reading's argument that it the decline of literature is audience' fault because the less literature audience read, the less publisher invest in literature. 마찬가지로 '이해하기가 어렵다'보다 먼저 '사람들이 많이 안 읽는 건 잘못이 아니다, 문학에 잘못이 있다'라는 lecture의 반박 입장이 함께 정리되는 편이 자연스러울 것 같아요. 지문 내용을 검토해보시고 lecture의 입장을 어떤 식으로 정리할지 체크해보시면 좋을 것 같습습니다.
Comment : 전체적으로 두 지문의 핵심 내용을 잘 파악해주셨습니다. '반박 주장'으로서 기능하게끔 흐름을 다듬는 부분들 체크해주시면 좋을 것 같아요. 제가 실제 지문 내용을 정확히 모르는 상태에서 흐름을 파악한 것이니 실제 내용과 비교점검하면서 빠진 내용이나 잘못 파악된 내용은 없는지도 한 번 더 체크해주세요~ 수고 많으셨습니다~!
Integrated Writing Rubrics Score 4/5 A response at this level is generally good in selecting the important information from the lecture and in coherently and accurately presenting this information in relation to the relevant information in the reading, but it may have minor omission, inaccuracy, vagueness, or imprecision of some content from the lecture or in connection to points made in the reading. A response is also scored at this level if it has more frequent or noticeable minor language errors, as long as such usage and grammatical structures do not result in anything more than an occasional lapse of clarity or in the connection of ideas.
|