▶ Your Answer : The lecturer claims that it is better to
consume organic produce product. This contradicts the reading’s view that it is
disputable to consider whether organic produce product is superior to conventionally grown fruits
and vegetables.
First, the lecturer argues that natural
pesticides are not as harmful as chemical pesticides. To be specific, natural pesticides decompose
quickly, so there isn’t is not any pesticide remaining in the products by the time
they arrive the markets. This counterattacks the reading’s argument that
natural pesticides are as harmful as chemical pesticides.
Secondly, the lecturer points out that
organic produce product do not does not have a higher chance of being contaminated. In fact, organic
farmers have guidelines, such as certification labels, to minimize the bacteria
in the product. This casts doubt on the reading’s point that natural
fertilizers that farmers use to grow organic produce can have a higher chance
of being contaminated.
Lastly, the lecturer asserts that consuming
organic products cannot be considered as being less economical. This means that
considering the abundant nutrients and vitamins contained in the organic
products, it is worth the cost. This rebuts the reading’s assertion that is
less economical to consume organic produce. Good: 24~30 점수: 27 대립되는 리딩과 리스닝을 잘 비교한 거 같습니다. 특히 리스닝에 대한 반박 부분에 대해서 리딩의 정보를 잘 풀어나간 거 같습니다. 하지만 아쉬운 부분이 있습니다. 먼저 첫번째로는 organic and convenient produce라는 단어는 없습니다, 항상 product입니다 이 부분을 참고 하시길 바랍니다. 또한 리딩의 정보가 좀 더 필요 한 거 같습니다. 비록 리스닝의 대한 반박은 잘해 주 고 있지만 좀 더 이유에 대한 설명에 관한 반박 부분 또한 넣어 주시면 더 좋은 에세이가 될 거 같습니다. 수고많으셧습니다. |