▶ Your Answer :
The reading passage contends that space
travel has several benefits. On the other hand, the lecturer brings up several
points that contradict this argument.
First, the lecturer argues that it is
untrue that space travel can help scientists to explore space easily because of
a low cost of ticket that is caused by fast spaceships. This is because space
travel companies should develop spaceship systems and consider safety, so, they
should rebuild spaceships so many times, which will give rise to spend a lot of
money. Companies would require a very high cost of space travel tickets, so, people
won’t buy the ticket. As a result, high-technology spaceships can’t help scientists
research space easily. This casts doubt on the reading passage’s claim that
scientists can explore space easily by future spaceships.
Second, the lecturer asserts that it is impossible
for space travel to accelerate scientific discoveries. The reason is that space
companies spend a lot of money on employing high-skilled workers such as
spaceship drivers, scientists. They won’t
have enough money to discover a lot of scientific things. This refutes the
reading passage’s claim that space travel will boost scientific discoveries.
The final point made by the lecturer is
that governments can’t earn a lot of revenue. This is supported by the fact
that private companies should spend billions-dollars on space travel. Thus,
they can’t have money to tax. Also, government would help them by using tax. This
counters the reading passage’s claim that governments can earn a lot of money
from the private companies. Good:24~30 점수: 24 일단 리딩에 대한 정보가 많이 부족합니다. 전체적인 논리적인 부분에 있어서는 아주 잘 서술하였습니다. 하지만 통합형 에세이에서 궁국적으로 보는 것은 얼마나 적절하게 리딩과 리스닝을 비교하였냐 이기 때문에 지금 처럼 한 문장으로 리딩에 대한 정보를 서술하는 것은 적절하지 않습니다. 한 문장으로 리딩에 대한 정보를 끝나는 것 보다는 리스닝을 좀 더 반박할 수 있는 부분들을 더 서술하시길 바랍니다. 리딩과 리스닝의 균형있는 정보조화가 통합형 에세이에서는 아주 중요합니다. 수고많으셧습니다.
|