There might be some people who believe that scientists are responsible for their discoveries, if it has they have negative impacts. There are obviously many opinions regarding with this topic, but it is clear that they do not have to be responsible what they discover even though it has a negative impacts. The concepts of health and motivation clearly show the theme. assert the argument.
First of all, it is too stressful for scientists to ask responsible what they did. This is mainly because if scientists are force to do something they do not want to accept, they will feel like discovering for humankind is a waste of time and they become unhappy. This situation will scientists stressed make scientists stress out. In fact, stress is the primary factor of illnesses because it weakens the ability of the immune system in fighting diseases. For example, my uncle, a doctor in a general hospital in a city, often tells me that many of his patients suffer adverse health effect from stress. They come to him for stress-related ailments and disorders such as headaches, high blood pressure, and insomnia. Some of them who come to him are scientists who are stressed out due to criticism of negative impacts of their discoveries. One of his patients, a famous scientist in the world, said that even though it was about three and half years ago, he feels uneasy and uncomfortable to study after forcing a negative impact of his experiment he was coerced from the adverse effect caused by his experiment. This situation eventually stress stresses him out, and he still suffer suffers from adverse health effect. This means people should not ask scientists to be responsible for negative impacts that they discovered.
In addition, not to take criticism what they made negative impacts increase their motivation. This is due to the fact that if they are not force what they do forced they could become brave and confident. This can be a facilitator which motivates them to improve themselves. They will make more effort, concentrate better, and feel more responsible what they do. This can bring about better outcome at study on their field. For example, my friend, a scientist in Japan, used to be negligent and lost interest in his job because at that time, Japaneses tended to ask them to be responsible for their experiment. However, after national policy on science field changed to prohibit to criticism them, he had changed little by little. He started to spend more time in the lab, and had an enthusiasm for study. He and other scientist said they do not have to care of anything they do, it made them to study more and felt free for invention.
In conclusion, it seems to me that scientists are not responsible for negative impacts of their discoveries. The concepts of health and motivation support the argument. Good: 24~30 점수: 25 일단 이 에세이를 읽어나가면서 가장 먼저 느꼈던 것은 에세이 자체가 장황하다는 것 입니다. 특히 이러한 면모는 첫 번째 바디에서 가장 크게 나타납니다. 첫 번째 바디를 보았을 때 너무 장황하여서 예시에만 중점을 두었다라는 느낌이 듭니다. 독립형 에세이에서 가장 크게 보는 것은 설득 력이 있나 인데. 이렇게 장황하게 모든 설명을 하려고 하는 것 보다는 간결하게 본인의 의견을 전달하는 것이 가장 좋을 같습니다. 수고많으셨습니다. |