▶ Your Answer :
The passage and the lecture both describes about consequences made by using fossils in for commercial purpose to private. The passage argues that this is disadvantageous for both scientists and general public. In contrast, the lecturer disagrees with about this opinion. The reading passage mentions that selling fossils to a private buyer will make other people to have a less opportunity to watch those fossils. (Watch? Why?) Furthermore, since the people cannot see fossils easily, their interest about them will be also declined. However, the lecturer insists that more people will be able to watch the fossils when people can buy them. This is because the institutes like schools and museums can also purchase the fossils, and they can get more materials to show to public. Therefore, general people can see the historic data more often. The reading passage also mentions declairs that the rich obtains most of the valuable and academically precious fossils. While the research institutes like museums and universities can use only limited amount of fund for buying fossils, they lose their chances to investigate those fossils. (Who are they?) On the contrary, the lecturer argues that in order to identify the value of fossils, helps from scientists are needed. (Why's that?) Therefore, scientists still play a do crucial roles on in researching fossils, which does not means they cannot access to fossils. Lastly, the reading passage mentions that the private fossil collectors are not advertent (Meaning?) in preserving the entire fossil safe. So they often destroy and damage the fossils, which makes the fossile loses its value and important historic and scientific information. However, the lecturer argues that the fact that fossils are damaged is not important. She says that it is meaningful that thanks to those private digger, the more fossils are being discovered. As little amount of fossils are found by public institutes, those private collectors are helping them. (Wrong sentence structure) Therefore, despite of damages the fossil got, the finding of fossils contributes to development of science. To sum up, the lecturer counters the argument made by the reading passage that selling and purchasing fossils in markets gives negative effects to researchers in academic institutes and general public, by giving the opinion that it is exaggerated.
채점기준표 | Grammar | Contents | Example | Coherence | 점수 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | Score | Limited 10-17 | - 통합형에서는 결론을 제시하지 않고, 세 가지 반박이유만을 제시하시면 됩니다.
- 흐름이 끊기는 표현들이 상당히 많이 보입니다. 예를 들면, while 에는 "동안","반면"이라는 뜻이 있는데 이에대한 문장의 해석이 이해하기 어렵습니다. - watch fossil 과 museums/ private buyers/ fossil collectors 들간의 관계를 보다 정확하게 설명해주셔야 합니다.
|
|