▶ Your Answer : The reading passage states about plans to prevent WNS for the main idea of the reading; however, the listening passage refutes this idea by providing several counterexamples. To begin with, the writher asserts that people have to increase acid in caves. Fungus cannot thrive in high acid. So, searchers added acid fertilizers to caves. Conversely, the lecture contradicts this idea by stating that making caves acid is unworking and impossible. Certaub fungus are tolerant to condition and it is alomost impossible to achieve and sustain high acid. Furthermore, the author contends that the second effective method is anticoagulant treat. Drugs used to infections are efficient. In contrast, the speaker belies this claim by stating that antifungual treat is not the only solution. This will possibly destroy beneficial fungi and bacteria. Also, it disrupts balance and endanger species. Moreover, the passage claims that the last way is thought to be artificial habitats. To be specific, bats are moved to settings disinfected and protect monitoring signs of trouble. On the contrary, the lecturer rebuts this point by stating that artificial habitats are impractical. Additionally, there is no way to construct for all. When bats are returned, they become vulnerable again.
Fair: 17~23 점수: 23 일단 철자적 오류들이 많습니다. 제가 첨삭한 부분을 보시고 숙지하시길 바랍니다. 통합형 에세이에서 가장 중요한 부분을 차지하는 것 중에 하나는 한 주제에 대하여서 서로 다른 정보를 가진 리딩과 리스닝이 어떻게 비교를 하고 반박하는지 입니다. 지금 이 에세이 같은 경우에는 리딩에 대한 부분이 한 문장으로만 되어잇습니다. 한 문장으로 끝내는 것 보다는 리스닝을 반박할 수 잇는 부분들을 더 서술해주시길 바랍니다. 수고많으셧습니다. |