In this set of materials, both the reading and the lecture deal with education Regrading this issue, the lecturer argues that student evaluations regard as negative effects. This contradicts the writer's claim that educational institutions help their service to improve for students through a lot of effective ways.
First, according to the lecturer, young students can't be trust their opinion easily. Since they often decide to their view by their emotion, their evaluations actually are not believed by others. For example, some students evaluated teacher low grade because of getting a not good grade at exam. This point refutes the writer's argument that it is good way to evaluate teacher in order for students to gain useful information.
Second, the lecturer goes on to say that, since students have a number of their point view of judging teacher, it is so hard for students to fit their levels This counters the reading passage's viewpoint that students play an important role in developing education service.
Lastly, the lecture mention that, just students' dissatisfaction makes teacher bad situation, so teaches do not need to change their teach style easily only due to students attitude. This cast doubts on the writer's claim that, since student evaluations encourage teacher to develope their educational quality, student evaluations have to be used by evidence of teacher status.
|