It is sometimes acceptable to infringe upon people’s freedom.
딱 시간맞춰서 실전처럼 써본 것입니다.. 고수님들 평가 부탁드려요 정말 간절합니다.. ㅠ |
Some people might argue that it can be acceptable to infringe upon people’s freedom only when emergency. However, I am sure that the bar against people’s freedom is never acceptable no matter when it is. This is because the divine trait of human right, and some historical instances which abused the restriction on freedom.
Above all, it is evident that there is human right god gives us, in which the representative divine right is the freedom. The freedom cannot be attacked only for itself. Therefore, the norms made by people such as moral, courtesy, or low ensure the freedom of human worldwide. Then, which situation and who can restrict the freedom of human? I think all the tasks on conflict, which are usually happened in a wide range of regions, are for keeping the freedom of their citizen in the end.
The second reason of that is there have been a lot of lamentable instances in which many people had to sacrifice their freedom because of the abusing of restriction on people. The most famous historical event in
To sum up, people’s freedom cannot be infringed regardless of the situation because the divine human right and the possibility of abusing it. And the most important thing is that the human freedom is the one that people have to pursue ultimately. |