▶ Your Answer : The reading passage contends that local governments’ incentives can create three positive outcomes by attracting new businesses from outside of their area. On the other hand, the lecturer brings up several points that contradict this argument. First, the speaker argues that giving incentives to attract businesses can not expand the tax revenue. One university founded that the overall tax revenue will decrease because the tax rebates. It means that the tax that they should pay decrease when the local government give incentives to companies. This casts doubt on the reading passage’s claim that offering incentives can expand the tax revenue needed to create many public facilities. Second, according to the lecturer, using incentives to lure new companies can not create many job positions. When new businesses move into local areas, they should compete with existing local companies. It can cause that some of local businesses can loss lose their status and people who work there are able to loss their jobs. In addition, when companies come into the local, they are likely to take their current employee from outside the local. This reputes the reading passage’s assertion that giving incentives to attract new businesses can make a lot of jobs for local employees. The final point made by the lecture is that the local government cannot improve their environment by offering green incentives to businesses. This is because green companies make pollution as well. The environment can improve when only the environmentally friendly companies replace the conventional plants. This contradicts the reading passage’s argument that the local environment can get benefits by giving green incentives to companies by the local government. Good: 24~30 점수: 26 대채로 서로 대립되고 있는 리딩과 리스닝을 아 주 잘 비교 하였습니다. 항상 숙지해야하는 부분은 리딩과 리스닝에 대한 정보가 동등하게 나타나어져야 합니다. 지금 이 에세이는 충분하게 정보를 전달 하고 있지만 리딩에 대한 정보가 약간 부족하다라는 느낌이 듭니다. 한 문장으로만 끝내는 것이 아니라, 리스닝을 반박할 수 있는 부분과 리딩에 특징적인 이유들을 좀 더 넣어주면 더 좋을 거 같습니다. 수고많으셨습니다. |