▶ Your Answer :
The
lecturer argues that the advantages of wind farms are overestimated. This contradicts
the reading passage’s claim that wave farms have promising future as
alternative energy source.
To
commence with, the lecturer insists that wave energy generation is inconsistent
and unpredictable. Harsh ocean environment is likely to cause malfunction and
break down of the wave power plants, and disrupted power generation would lead
to unpredictable and fluctuating energy generation. This cast doubt on the
reading passage’s claim that it is possible to anticipate the amount of energy
that will be produced by wave power plants.
Moreover,
the lecturer asserts that wave farms cause adverse effects to the environment. They
contain harmful chemicals and have possibility to release them into the ocean.
For example, chemical lubricants, which are applied to the convertors for their
free movements, are highly toxic and will cause negative effects to marine
plants and animals when leaked. This counters the reading passage’s claim that
wave energy is environmentally friendly.
Lastly,
the lecturer contends that wave energy facilities will bring about negative
aesthetic effects. Wind energy converters should be painted with bright colors
to be detected from shipping vessels, and are located near the shore. Thus,
they would be easily detected by tourists and harm the scenery. This rebuffs
the reading passage’s claim that converters are too small to cause negative
visual effect.
에세이 깔끔하게 정말 잘 쓰셨습니다. 기본 format과도 아주 잘 match하며, 문장의 flow도 아주 자연스럽게 이어집니다. 어휘도 최대한 다양하게 쓰려고 한 점 정말 잘 보여서 좋았습니다. reading과 listening잘 버무려서 작성한 것 같고, 문법 오류 없습니다. 이렇게만 쓰시면 고득점 가능하실 것 같습니다. 파이팅입니다.
|