동물원은 아무런 쓸모가 없는가? |
Some people said that a zoo is useful in proection of animals and educations about various animal behaviors. But nowdays, there are many drawbacks in a zoo. They lost their function to protect animals and other forms of the education of animals emerge. Therefore I believe strongly that The zoo is usefuleness in these days.
To start with, animals have a opportunity to live wild environments such as jungle, river, and forest. some animal protectors claim that animals in danger shoud be protected form any hazarduous surroundings. But most animals in a zoo are not endagered animals. Although a small number of animals exists in zoo, they do not be cured perfectly. As they are likely to be infectious through their week immune system which is developed in the zoo, they are even weeker than natural environments. therefore they should live in wild environmants instead of artificial zoos.
On top of that, Runing a zoo costs more than letting them in natural habitats. Todays, a zoo have a large number of animals which needed to be take cared. It means that a zoo required specialists who can take care of endangred animals, huge facilities, and some preys. These things are significantly big burdens to run a zoo. If these money are invested in other programs like national geographics or university's laborotories which research on animals, researchers even better protect endanged animals in a zoo and help them efficiently in the long-term.
To sum up, a zoo is not efficiency in protecting animals and they cost too expensive to run a zoo. We have to realize that animals are not an object of interest. Therefor a zoo is needless to exist. Animals should live in their home where is wild nature instead of a artificial prison. |