■ Direction You have 20 minutes to plan and write your response. Your response will be judged on the basis of The quality of writing and on how well your response presents the points in the lecture and the relationship to the reading passage. Typically, an effective response will be 150 to 225 words. ■ Question Summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard, explaining how they cast doubt on the points made in the reading
|
|
|
|
|
▶ Your Answer : The reading passage contends that sulfur dioxide is a lethal gas with a repugnant odor and a strong ability to damage the earth and it can be fully explained by three reasons. On the other hand, the lecturer brings up several points that contradict this argument. First, the speaker argues that the relationship between the amount of sulfur dioxide and acid rain is not strong. This is because there are so many factors which can affect making acid rain. Reducing sulfur dioxide will not prevent us from being exposed to acid rain. This cast doubts on the reading passage's claim that sulfur dioxide is the reason for making acid rain. Second, according to the lecture, sulfur dioxide itself does not directly cause people to develop respiratory problems such as asthma. The reason is that it (it 이 지칭하는 것이 무엇인가요? 상세하게 써주세요.) is made by not sulfur dioxide but sulfur gas which is resulted in a chemical process with oxygen. It can negatively affect humans' health, but it does not mean sulfur dioxide has the same effect. This refutes the reading passage's argument that humans are also negatively impacted by sulfur dioxide. The final point made by the lecturer is that reducing the amount of sulfur dioxide will make side effects that negatively affect the environment. This is supported by the fact that decreasing the amount of sulfur dioxide would aggravate the symptom of global warming. One of its roles is to reflect sunlight and maintain the temperature of the earth. This counters the reading passage's argument that reducing the amount of sulfur dioxide will make more preserved environment. |
|
1. 각 문단 시작 전에 tab 버튼 눌러서 들여쓰기 해주세요.
2. reading and listening의 비율이 너무 listening쪽으로만 치우쳐져 있습니다.
비율은 5:5, 적어도 6:4 정도는 되어야 합니다.
이는 리딩에 대한 디테일 부족으로 이어지며, 분량 부족, 추가 설명 실패 등으로 이어질 수 있으니
리딩에서도 evidence를 많이 찾아서 써주시면 좋을 것 같습니다.
3. 문법은 깔끔한 편이고 문장력도 좋으신 것 같습니다.
수고하셨습니다. *^^*