▶ Your Answer :
The lecturer claims that the "let it burn" policy was fundamentally good. This contradicts the reading passage's claim that many people wanted to replace the "let it burn" policy that made three kinds of damage.
First of all, the lecturer argues that Yellowstone fires make the area's species more diverse because their new open place was more suitable for some species. She says that some species thrived since they needed more high-level heat that occurred after the fire. This refutes the reading passage's argument that the park seemed like a devastated wasteland.
Secondly, the speaker asserts that it allowed some species to thrive in there and provided the other predators that depend on them to ideal habitats. She says that it made the disruption of food chains stronger. This casts doubt on the reading passage's assertion that Yellowstone fires caused huge damage to park wildlife.
Lastly, the professor insists that the Yellowstone fires were very unusual since it was caused by the combination factors such as strong winds, low rainfall. So, she mentions that park visitors still come next year. This counters the reading passage's contention that it had negative effects on the value of the park as a tourist place.
문법 오류 전혀 없습니다. 문장적인 오류도 거의 없이 잘 쓰신 것 같습니다. 어휘도 다양하게 쓰려고 한 점 보여서 너무 좋았습니다. format에 맞게 reading/listening 잘 비율 맞춰서 작성하신 것 같아 읽으면서 좋았습니다. 이대로만 쓰면 고득점 잘 나올 것 같습니다. |