Being leader is better than being a follower. |
Most groups deal with a number of works. In the any group, a leader is existed and a follower is also existed. It is often said that it is better to be a leader than a follower. Maybe, anyone wants to be a leader in excellent group. However, some people do not want to be a leader. I also strongly support that being a leader is not better than a follower for following reasons. The primary reason for being a leader is not attractive is that not everyone has skills for leadership. In other word, having a excellent leadership is not easy to usual people. For example. in our business class, my major class, my professor give us a team list. And then we should organize taem as taam sheet which is given by professor. In addition, in the sheet, a team leader is fixed by temporary professor’s dicision. In that case, the person who has not a excellent leadership can be a leader and he or she who is a unsuitable leader collapses our team and sometimes our leader provide incorrect purpose of team. In addition, our leader did not know how manage our team, who is suitable for a difficult tasks. One top of that, taking a leader is too risky because of the possible negative consuquences. If a leader who exsist in our team is very clever and having excellent ability to deal with a hard task, our team can be considered as a perfect team. However, a incompetent leader occurs tragidic problem which effects negatively to all members of a team. The prime example is that if above case occurred in a big company which is also considerd as a team, whole economy in one’s country can be effected negatively.
In summary, becoming a leader should not entered up lightly, but avoided in most cases. Some advantages which is good opportunity to experience by being a leader do not cover above. Therefore, being a follower is better.
|