그냥 문장만 좀 봐주시면 고맙겠네요....나다 영재님도 이제 잘 안오시나... 해커스 131쪽 |
The lecturer describes an actual example of a company which change their working arrangement to thirty-two hours. She contend that this modification leads to many bad results.
After a company changing their working arrangement, it should hire more workers and spend more money on training them. In addition that, the cost for insurance sharply increases because more free time for outside of workplace rises possibility to be wounded. Thus, there is no finacial advantage for the company, contrary to the reading passage.
Next, while employees have more time to relax or enjoy with their family, they can not improve their skills or be proficient in the working field. So, they feel that they are not competitive and there are many people who are willing to work in five- days work week of forty-hour for being dexterous worker. If they continue to work in this situation, they can not get pleasure from work and get stressed out. This fact can make their productivity lower, which is opposition to the reading passage`s claim that modifying working hours make workers happier and increase productivity.
Finally, since workers work less than before, their salary is decreased, which results in less consumsion. This point directly contradict the passage`s assertion that turning to a four-day workweek is beneficial to economy which get money from new coming employees. |