In the lecture, the professor talks about tendency of women in science. He mention that there are many hopes for women to enter the science world. It reputes the reading passage which explain several reasons that historical lack of women in science. To begin with the professor told about behavior of teachers. In school, teachers usually complicate girls in science class. Also they encourage girls to enjoy science and promote the girls to be scientists. However reading says that gender stereotypes paint girl as not suitable to science. Second of all, he completely rebuts the reading by mentioning nowadays' financial scholarship to women. Women don't have to worry about money when study science. They can get large amount of financial assistants from government thanks to the atmosphere that encourages women to have science job. In contrast according to the reading it argue that low salaries keep women from work in science fields. Lastly, the teacher told that there are so many organization which combat to sexism. Thanks to those help, now, women have no obstacle to be in top positions. Therefore women can do very lively activities in jobs. This opinion also oppose to the reading. In the reading passage, the writer said that there are still male-dominated atmosphere in real job field. To sum up, the professor entirely oppose to the reading in three views. Firs of all, he told about tendency of women which appropriate to science enough, Moreover, there are adequate amount of financial help to women, and existence of organization that combat sexism also encourage women in science. |