Today, people have their own jobs and they try to be the bests in their fields. Therefore, they should focus on their own fields. However, it does not mean that they have to study only the subjects that are related to their jobs. Since learning also general subjects can ( 의미상 좀 이상합니다. learning general subjects also 로 단어 나열을 바꾸셔야 더 나을듯.) help(s) students have more of general knowledge, and help them do better in their fields, those students should not be forced to focus only on specific courses.
To begin with, education of general subjects of students(삭제해도될듯) in universities give them more knowledge. Even though the subjects are not directly related to the majors of the students, they might be a help in some situations. To illustrate, when I was in Harvard University, (ㅎㅎㅎ 너무 예가 완전 극단적입니다.ㅎㅎㅎ문제될건 없지요.ㅎ) my major was international laws. One day, I had to attend one of my professors' seminar because he wanted me to listen to what he said. There, he talked about the placebo effect. At first I did not understand what he said, but a little later, I soon found out(remembered) that it is about patient being cured only by his belief. It was able because I had attended a science class in the first year of the university. Attending a science class in spite that it was not a part of my major became a lot of help to me. ( 괜찮긴 한데 뭔가 설득력이 부족한 느낌이 듭니다. 예를 바꾸시던지 아니면 메인 아이디어를 바꾸셔서 새롭게 전개해보시는것도 나쁘지 않을 거 같네요 )
In addition, despite the fact that some basic subjects are not parts of some students' major, they are somehow all related to each other, which makes students obligatory to study general subjects. If a person cannot do math, he cannot solve, not all, but some science problems, and if he does not know about his country's history, he might not well understand a book written about his the tragedies of the country in the past. (이것도 단어 순서 변환이 필요함. the tragedies of his country in the past) For example, my best friend John is totally out of interest of national history. Last Wednesday, our language arts teacher gave us homework that is to read a book called "The Division", which was about the separation of our country, and then he said that we were going to take tests about it. While every students knew at least the basic story of our history, he knew nothing at all. The next day, he did not pass the test and he had to have detention after the class. Since he thought the national history, which was in fact related to language arts(,) had nothing to do with it, which was his major, the test had been very disadvantageous to him.
Some people might say that learning subjects that are not majors of students is(->are) only an obstacle because it lengthens the amount of time it takes for them to achieve dreams. However, because general education provides students with more knowledge which at intervals help them, and help them do better in their fields, students should also learn other subjects (other 까지 붙이셔야죠. other than ~이외에도) than their own majors, too.
전체적으로는 무난한듯 합니다.
이거 8월 25일 제가 셤 볼때 나온 주제네요.ㅎ
음. 개인적으로 저도 이 주제 무척 어려웠습니다.
딱 봤을때는 쉬워보였는데...이게 은근히 할 말이 없더군요. 예 들기도 쉽지 않고.
저는 그때 이렇게 논리 전개했습니다.
- 일반적인 과목도 배워야한다.
1. 취업교육만 시키는 것은 대학교육의 취지와 맞지 않다.
- 대학은 학생들의 지식을 넓혀주는 역할을 하지 기술만 가르치는게 아니다.
- 취업교육만 받은 학생들은 좁은 지식으로 인해 취업전선에서 어려움을 많이 겪는다
ex) 대기업 LG CEO 의 인터뷰 "요즘 졸업생들은 총체적인 사고력 부족으로 일을 잘 처리못한다. " -> 물론 뻥임.ㅋㅋ
2. 취업교육강화는 학교 분위기를 너무 competitive 하게 한다.
- 대학은 교육과 낭만과 추억이 공존하는 곳이다.
- 취업교육만 집중하다보면 학생간 경쟁이 높아져서 한 인간의 대학추억을 만드는 것을 방해한다.
ex) 내가 대학다닐때 친구들이 너무 취업에만 몰두하여 친구사귀기도 쉽지 않았으며 대학생활도 재미없었다. 나에게는 그들과의 추억이란 존재하지 않는다. 그래서 씁쓸하다.
이렇게 썼습니다. 물론 시간이 부족해서 결론부분 마지막 한문장 못썼지만요.ㅎㅎ (항상 제가 하는 식으로, However, they have to remember the fact~ 이거 있잖아요.ㅎ 이거 못썼어요. )
여튼, 저도 그리 잘쓴거 같지는 않더라구요, 주제가 은근 까다롭다보니.ㅎㅎ
좋은 하루 되시길~ 저는 리딩 공부하러 갑니다.ㄱㄱㄱ
|