Do you agree or disagree with the statement that it is better to be a leader of a group than to be a member of the group. |
It is the most difficult mission that someone acquires the leadership in business as well as our daily life. Nevertheless it is apparent that everyone aspires to be a leader. Why do you think of that? The reason is that being a leader confers several good things to us. Thus I assent with the statement that to be a leader is better than to be a member of a group. Firstly, we can procure the sociability by experiencing to be a leader. If we are assigned to be a leader, we will have many necessary duties and obligations. That is, we might get enormous responsibility. Through those hardships the leader would attain the sociality. In my case, I have been a leader in my class when I was 10 years old. By then I was a especially shy girl. However since I’ve been the leader in my class I could gain the confidence and leadership. Those helped me out a lot until now since I can be more active and self-assured. In other words being a leader actually changed my personality positively. Additionally, I strongly believe that being a leader can give you the sense of complacency. For this reason, many politicians have strong desire to be a leader. If you are a leader, you can enjoy the pleasant of power. That’s because everyone in a group will follow your order and consent with your opinion. To be specific, the leader always could feel that he or she is the very influencing person and also he or she become a significant member of the group. That is to say, you will obtain the achievement and pleasure. To sum up, given the choice between the leader and member of a group, I would choose to be a leader. Through my experiences I think the advantage of being a leader is mush bigger since you can get the adaptability and huge happiness by that. As many people of all over the world show, leadership is the most valuable quality in our life. |