▶ Your Answer :
In the lecture, the speaker casts doubt on the
hypothesis related to the cause of transient lunar phenomena, which is
also called TLPs. This contradicts the reading's assertion that there are
three plausible hypothesis about the cause of TLPs.
To
begin with, the lecturer claims that the clouds of lunar gas is not responsible
for TLPs. This is because the gases observed at the moon might be a
coincidence. Moreover, a probe sent to the moon does not indicate how
much amount of gas is emitted. This challenges that reading's claim
that clouds of lunar gas are causing the phenomena.
Second,
the lecturer argues that there is no evidence that TLPs are illuminated clouds
of dust floating the lunar landscape. If the dusts were visible from the earth,
they must have been very huge. However, there was no such indication of
large clouds occurred from the moon. This challenges that reading's claim
that TLPs are illuminated clouds of dust.
Last,
the lecturer states that the theory has insufficient data about
the relation between solar radiation and TLPs. According to a recent
data, there is not much correlation between the solar radiation and TLPs. This
contradicts the reading's point that TLPs are caused by solar radiation.
점수: 27 지적할 부분이 없는 통합형 에세이입니다. 통합형 에세이에서 가장 중요한 부분을 차지하는 것은 한 주제에 대하여서 서로 다른 정보를 가지고 있는 리딩과 리스닝이 어떻게 비교하고 반박을 하는 것인지를 보는 것 입니다. 지금 이 에세이 같은 경우는 리딩이나 리스닝 둘 다 구체적으로 자기가 무엇을 말하려고 하는 것인지를 잘 보여줍니다. 잘 서술하였습니다. 수고많으셨습니다.
|