▶ Your Answer :
Both the reading and the lecturer are discussing the factors that contribute to the initiation of the Industrial Revolution. While the reading suggests three possible reasons, the lecturer casts doubt on these.
To begin with, the reading states that the Great Britain encourages encouraged the wealthy to get involved in various industry industries by guaranteeing them to own their property and various resources with effective property rights. In contrast, the professor insists the introduction of property rights was not the key factor for the start of the revolution by taking an example of the Netherlands, who which had similar property rights as the Great Britain. She instead suggests resources, maintaining social infrastructures (resources and maintaining social infra인가요? 아니면 maintaining social infra를 위한 resources를 의미하는 것인가요? 이 부분 어법이 어색합니다) were more important ones.
Second, the reading mentions the decline of the transportation costs as well as advances of transportation infrastructure and services that maintain trade. The listening, however, is highly skeptical of this point that. The professor explains that although transportation fees had been decreased, other costs such as tax or service fees increased. This increase cancelled out the positive effects of decrease in transportation cost.
Lastly, the reading persists the new technology, especially steam engine and power as the most essential factor. The lecturer disagrees with the reading by saying that new technology was only the a minor cause of the Industrial Revolution. She instead suggests coal as the greatest contributor by comparing the amount of coal used in the Great Britain with other European countries during that period.
Score: 13 Comments: - 전체적으로 구조가 잘 잡혀있습니다. - 문법 실수가 많습니다. - 요약에 디테일이 조금 빠져있는 것 같아요. - 중요한 포인트들을 잘 잡아주신 것 같습니다. 그러나 요약에 디테일이 조금 빠져있는 것 같아요. 설명을 조금 더 풀어서 해주시면 좋을 것 같습니다. - In the listening이라고 표현하시지 마시고 lecture라고 해주세요.
|