▶ Your Answer :
The reading passage contends that CO2
in the atmosphere which aggravates global warming can be reduced by 3 methods.
On the other hand, the lecturer objects to the points mentioned in the reading
passage about solutions to decrease CO2.
First, the lecturer argues that the solution
which uses phytoplankton to reduce CO2 is wrong. As the speaker
says, even if people add iron to the oceans for increasing to increase the amount of phytoplankton
using CO2 for photosynthesis, the number of phytoplankton would not be
increased at the end because of lack of nitrogen which is essential for
phytoplankton. In addition, it is very inefficient way for decreasing to decrease CO2 since
the only 3% of CO2 in the atmosphere is the maximum consumption of phytoplankton.
This casts doubt on the author’s claim that increasing the number of
phytoplankton by adding iron to the ocean is a good way to reduce CO2.
Second, the speaker contends that the
point in the reading passage regarding with artificial wetlands is flawed. As
the professor says, even though it is true that the water layer of artificial wetlands
can hamper the activity of bacteria releasing CO2, it is not that implausible
as it sounds. This is because it takes very long time to build artificial
wetlands as long as hundreds years. This contradicts the writer’s opinion that
creating wetlands is another excellent way to sequester CO2.
Finally, the professor points out that the
author’s claim concerning coal mines which CO2 can be attached is
false. The speaker states that coal mines produce methane gases when CO2 attaches
their surface and the methane gas is one of major fuels. Since methane gases
emit CO2 when they are burn, there is not any change in amount of CO2
in the atmosphere. This goes against the writer’s view that combining coal
mines with CO2 gases can be helpful since CO2 tend to attach
coal mines’ surface when they meet. Good:24~30 점수: 27 대채로 서로 비교되고 있는 리딩과 리스닝의 정보를 잘 분배하면서 서술하였습니다. 통합형 에세이에서 가장 중요한 부분은 얼마나 적절하게 리딩과 리스닝을 비교하였는 가 입니다. 이러한 부분에 있어서는 잘 서술하였습니다. 하지만 문제가 되는 것은 리딩의 정보가 리스닝에 비해서 많이 빈약한 거 같습니다. 한 문 장으로 서술하면서 끝내는 것이 아니라 리스닝을 반박할 수 잇는 몇 문장들을 더 서술하시면좋을 거 같습니다. 수고많으셨습니다. |