▶ Your Answer :
In the reading passage, there
is ample support for the author’s claim that Lambeosaurus’s crest had few roles.
However, the professor in the lecture gives several reasons as a rebuttal to the
author’s point.
First, the
professor contends that it is doubtful for crest to be used for attracting
mates. Reptiles usually use the sound to appeal to their potential mate. For
example, crocodile, the close animal to dinosaur, lifts and downs their head to
make noisy sound when they try to tempt the female. This cast doubt on the
reading passage’s claim that the crests grew and changed as they got older and
female more preferred larger one.
Next, the professor
insists that crests were not used as combat with the other species. According
to its fossil indicating the Lambeosaurus were in fight, the dinosaur poses as
standing backward. Also, the crests are fragile to engaging because its
internal structure is hollow. This counters the reading passage’s assertion
that large protrusion used as protective helmet and means of striking.
Finally, the
professor argues that crests did not provide the sufficient air. Lambeosaurus
is such a huge animal that needs a lot of oxygen. It might rather take a deep
breath than of being provided by crests. This refutes the reading passage’s
suggestion that crests was for supplying air when it dived in underwater for protract
time.
점수: 22 리딩에 대한 정보가 많이 부족한 통합형 에세이입니다. 통합형 에세이에서 가장 중요한 부분을 차지하는 것은 한 주제에 대하여서 서로 다른 정보를 가지고 있는 리딩과 리스닝이 어떻게 비교하고 반박을 하는 것인지를 보는 것 입니다. 지금 이 에세이 같은 경우는 리딩에 대한 부분을 한 문장으로만 서술하였는데. 한 문장으로 리딩에 대한 부분을 끝내는 것 보다는 리스닝을 좀 더 반박할 수 있는 부분들을 더 서술하시길 바랍니다. 수고많으셧습니다.
|