▶ Your Answer :
The reading passage asserts that there are three definite reasons why people need sleep through three reasons for this. However, the lecturer totally refutes the passage by stating that the stated reasons are it is unclear why people sleep. To begin with, the lecturer maintains that people’s memories are not related to dream of ram sleep. The brain can maintain still good memories without dreaming during ram sleep. (Mention evidence) This is antagonistic to the reading passage’s claim that people who have more dreams possess better memories. Furthermore, in the lecture, she contends sleep doesn’t build up energy but rather food supplies is the main supply of energy. This, however, completely contradicts a point of the reading passage that when people sleep, their energy is replenished. Lastly, the speaker disagrees with the reading passage’s argument that the amount of sleep contributed to the toxins (Why did you mention "toxin"?) remain in our body. She states that experiments regarding this is still inconclusive. In a nutshell, the lecturer entirely rebuts the reading passage, which argues importance of sleep, by mentioning nobody is certain about whether sleep allows the elimination of toxins, and research is inconclusive.
채점기준표 | Grammar | Contents | Example | Coherence | 점수 | 2 | 2
| 1 | 2 | Score | Limited 10-15 | - ram sleep? 은 무엇인가요? REM sleep을 말하시는 것 같네요, 정정하여 주세요.
- 세 가지 리스닝과 리딩의 주장이 모두 명확하지 않고, 근거가 많이 미흡한 편입니다. - 결론은 통합형에서 언급하지 않도록합니다.
|
|