▶ Your Answer :
It is debatable that whether not telling a lie is the most important factor when people have a conversation, because pursuing a truth is one of the most cherished values for human beings. I think that being a morally immaculate person when talking is a meaningful bid, but at times not being such a person will much more reinforce a rapport between people.(이 부분은 무슨 말을 하려고 하는 거지요?? 이해가 되지 않습니다 설명이 필요해 보입니다)
Consider a situation where all people turn into a kind of the no-nonsense person. when they are greeting, they will say like this. one questions. "How are you today?" the other answers. "Awful, because the conditions of my body are not in a state of zenith and you must be known the fact, because your conditions are undoubtedly in a imperfect state. Why are you teasing me?" 이 단락에서는 하려고 하는 말이 뭔가요? 주제에 대한 이유인가요 아니면 인트로에서 부터 계속해서 이어져 가는 건가요?
These conversations may be the inevitable result when people pursue only the truth, because we human beings usually suffer from a welter of stresses from their daily lives, incurring a variety of negative emotions which could be the cause of strifes between people.
In lieu of telling nothing but the truth, adding some kinds of white lies in their conversations can lubricate relationships between people. In a society where all people become a generous person for a modicum of white lies when communicating, that preposterous situation will not happen, because witty pleasantries will supersede all the awkward remarks. This will prevent people from having altercations, contributing positive rapports for their relationship. As moral philosopher Mill put it, the importance of act would rather be judged by the gains which are resulted from the act.
Being a man of integrity when someone have a conversation is an important virtue, because the relationship is based on trust. But being always that type of person is not a desirable judgement, because In doing so he or she may incur adverse effects for their rapport. Therefore, having a morally-flexible mind is much more valuable than sticking the psyche of a non-negotiable person. Fair: 17~23 점수: 17 전체적으로 이 에세이를 통해서 하려고 하는 말이 무엇인가요? 구조적으로도 독립형 에세이에 맞지 않습니다. 정확하게 어떠한 부분이 인트로이고 바디가 어디있고 결론이 뭔지가 파악이 안됩니다. 구조적으로 적절치 않는 에세이인 거 같습니다. 또한 각 바디의 단락들이 어떤 의미로 서술되었는 지 보여주지가 않습니다. 구체적인 단어나 설명을 통해서 명확하게 서술하시는 것이 이 에세이에서 가장 중요해 보입니다. 좀 더 명확하게 단락을 나누어주시길 바랍니다. 수고많으셨습니다.
|