▶ Your Answer :
The lecturer
claims that the Laocoon is not carried by Michelangelo. This contradicts the
reading passage’s claim that Michelangelo created the forgery.
First, the
lecturer contends that it is not true that Michelangelo have forged the Laocoon
to fool his rival, Giuliano da Sangallo. He was a close friend of Michelangelo,
not a rival and sometimes assisted Michelangelo painting chapel’s celling. This
refutes the reading passage’s assertion that Michelangelo made the forgery to trick
his rival.
Second, the
lecturer maintains that the Laocoon’s resemblance to a painting of Michelangelo
does not prove the fact that He made the Laocoon. He said that he was pronouncedly
influenced by the Laocoon and ‘The Last Judgment’ was his reaction to the
forgery. This rebuts the reading passage’s claim that the fact that the forgery
is akin to the painting of Michelangelo is a decisive evidence.
Finally, the speaker
argues that the forgery was considered as serious offence. Most people already knew
that the forgery is not real and it is the attempt to trick other people.
Additionally, the penalty of the forgery imitation was death in extreme case at
that time. This casts doubt on the reading passage’s argument that the fact
that the forgery was a usual and permitted artistic practice during the
Renaissance was not true.
lecturer, speaker이렇게만 쓰면 주어가 누군지 잘 모릅니다. reading인지 listening인지 제대로 적어야 comparison이 확실히 됩니다. 통합형인만큼 listening 얼마나 쓰는지 중요하니, listening에서 말하는 부분 최대한 많이, 자세하게 적는거 추천드립니다.
|