■ Direction You have 20 minutes to plan and write your response. Your response will be judged on the basis of The quality of writing and on how well your response presents the points in the lecture and the relationship to the reading passage. Typically, an effective response will be 150 to 225 words. ■ Question Summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard, explaining how they cast doubt on the points made in the reading
|
|
|
▶ Topic : The reading passage asserts that archaeologists have determined how to Chaco Canyon in New Mexico was used. There are three theories regarding the Chago Canyon. On the other hand, The lecture brings up several points that contradict (복수동사) this argument. The lecturer questions the validity of the point made by reading passage that Chaco canyon was purely residential, with each housing hundreds of people. It is attributed by the fact that there are a few fire places that could help people live in there. So the (대소문자 구분) reading passage states that Chaco couldn't (동사가 어디있나요?) great houses The reading passage's the first point is refuted. The lecturer casts doubt on the point in reading passage that Chaco structures were used to store food supplies such as grain maize. Although it is plausible, there is not founded the maize floor and remained big container that could save the crops. (이 문장이 무슨 뜻인지 모르겠어요...!) Consequently the reading passage's second point is refuted The lecturer disagrees with the point in reading passage that the houses were used as ceremonial centers. It is not convincing. To be specific, Even if there is an huge mound that is formed by a stack of old material, it is not proven that it is used for (전치사) special ceremonies. It could be a just packed trash. Last but not least, with such reasoning, the reading passage's final point is invalid. | |
|
|
1. 각 문단 시작 전에 tab 버튼 눌러서 들여쓰기 해주세요.
2. 전체적으로 내용이 많이 빈약하고 문법이 불안정합니다.
정확하게 뭐라고 나와있는지 인용하는 습관을 들여주세요.
바디의 길이도 많이 짧아서 전체적으로 분량을 많이 증량해주세요.
수고하셨습니다. *^^*