▶ Your Answer :
In the lecture, the professor casts doubt on the reading passage's idea that prescribed burning is not a desirable method because it is efficient and has a lot of perils. The professor asserts that prescribed burning has benefits following three reasons. First and foremost, according to the reading, prescribed burning is not helpful for cleaning to clean debris and forests' growth. Rather, an intrusion of foreign species arouses in the forest, so they can destroy the ecosystem's balance. In opposition to this argument, the professor claims that prescribed burning triggers a number of advantages as replenishing nutrients. Moreover, invasive species' interference is rare. The lecturer gives an example that indigenous people had utilized this method to sustain forests for a long time, so prescribed burning is reliable activity. Secondly, the reading passage describes how prescribed burning's handling is difficult. When weather conditions suddenly change, a fire is bigger or the direction of fires radically diverts. In contrast, the professor argues that those who control prescribed burning are trained for a long time. Thus, such happening hardly occurs. Lastly, the professor rebuts the reading passage's points that prescribed burning's cost are not efficient while disking is the more safe and effective method regarding the management of the forest. The professor points out that prescribed burning is the cheapest way because a great deal of money can save. can be saved. For instance, this manner can prevent much larger damage from natural fires.
점수: 22 리딩에 대한 부분이 많이 부족한 통합형 에세이입니다. 통합형 에세이에서 가장 중요한 부분을 차지하는 것은 한 주제에 대하여서 서로 다른 정보를 가지고 있는 리딩과 리스닝이 어떻게 비교하고 반박을 하는 것인지를 보는 것 입니다. 지금 이 에세이 같은 경우에 있어서는 리딩에 대한 부분이 각 단락에서 한 문장으로만 서술하였는데. 한 문장으로 끝내는 것 보다는 리스닝을 좀 더 반박할 수 있는 부분들을 더 서술하시길 바랍니다. 수고많으셨습니다. |